Jump to content

Tony Gill

SRC Member
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Tony Gill

  1. I think it's N. cyanomos rather than N. azysron. The latter species doesn't have dark edges on the caudal fin. Tony
  2. The sort of differences you point out are within the range of variation I've found in other Pseudoplesiops. Aside from your photos, the only others I have are from Flores and Misool (the latter in Gerry Allen and Mark Erdmann's Reef Fishes of the East Indies). There is always the possibility that your fish actually represents a different (thus new) species, and the distribution of other pseudochromid species would lend support to that possibility. I would need to examine specimens (and perhaps more photos) before I could make judgement on that.
  3. The other thing is the number of bands on the body. Although these are indistinct in the photos, it looks like it has the characteristic 8-10 narrow bands of P. poweri rather than the 4-5 broad bands of P. meleagris.
  4. I agree that it looks more like P. poweri, particularly in the head markings. This website has good photos of all Paraplesiops species, including photos of juveniles of several: http://www.fishesofaustralia.net.au/Home/genus/1097. Tony
  5. The goby looks like Pseudogobius javanicus. Tony
  6. It's a bit hard to tell from your photo, but I think it's Amblyeleotris gymnocephala. Tony
  7. Looks like Drombus triangularis to me. Tony
  8. Labracinus cyclophthalmus. This colour form is often referred to as L. melanotaenia, but I placed the latter in synonymy with L. cyclophthalmus in my 2004 revision of the Pseudochrominae. Basically I found there was considerable variation in the degree of striping in individuals from a given locality, from some with no stripes, to stripes on each scale row or stripes on alternative scale rows (as in the L. melanotaenia form). I found similar variation in the Western Australian species, L. lineatus. However, I am now revisiting the issue of whether L. cyclophthalmus is a single species or a complex of similar species, incorporating molecular sequence data and more comprehensive studies of live coloration. Tony
  9. It's a juvenile Scolopsis margaritifera - pearly monocle bream.
  10. The fish you have identified as Pseudoplesiops rosae is actually a species of Lubbockichthys - and quite possibly the same as your L. "multisquamatus" individual. I am still in the process of sorting out species in this genus, but many are difficult to identify without x-rays to examine skeletal characters. Real Pseudoplesiops rosae is a very different fish ... grows to around 3cm with large scales. There are photos of it here: http://research.kahaku.go.jp/zoology/Fishes_of_Andaman_Sea/contents/pseudochromidae/03.html Thanks, Tony
  11. This is a species of Lubbockichthys, possibly one of the new ones I'm working on from Cebu. Lubbockichthys species are difficult to tell apart ... I have been working on the genus for a couple of decades and still need x-rays to identify some of the species! There is a lot of confusion at the moment about these species, as several are often identified as Pseudoplesiops rosae. This error appears to have originated from a couple of guide books published by Rudie Kuiter, but has been perpetuated in the aquarium hobby. Real P. rosae is a very different fish: very small (around 3 cm) with large scales. There are photos of it here: http://research.kahaku.go.jp/zoology/Fishes_of_Andaman_Sea/contents/pseudochromidae/03.htmlhttp://research.kahaku.go.jp/zoology/Fishes_of_Andaman_Sea/contents/pseudochromidae/03.html The coloration can be very variable, ranging from green or brown to bright yellow or bright red. The dark marking behind in the eye is usually present, but is sometimes difficult to see. Thanks, Tony
  12. The fish in the photo appears to be a new species closely related to Pseudochromis reticulatus (from north-western Australia), P. pictus (SE Indonesia) and P. jace (NE Indonesia (West Papua)). I am currently working on another new species in the group (which is characterised by, among other things, the unusual caudal-fin shape) from NE Indonesia. I have some juvenile specimens from Cebu that may be the same as species in the photo here, but it would be good to have larger specimens for study. The pseudochromid in the footage from Indonesia is P. pictus. Thanks, Tony
  13. Great to see these photos. This is Pseudoplesiops collare, a species I described over 20 years ago with Jack Randall and Alasdair Edwards. (It was actually the first fish species I ever named.) This species is very rare in museum collections ... I am aware of only four specimens. I'd be very interested to hear more details on where they were photographed, etc., as I am currently working up a major paper revising the genus Pseudoplesiops. Thanks, Tony
  14. It looks like Halichoeres marginatus to me too. Tony
  15. Looks like a Tomiyamichthys species. Tony
  16. It's not a goby, but a blenny of the genus Omobranchus. I'm not sure of the species though ... possibly O. germaini. Tony
  17. Family Pseudochromidae; lower case "s" for "sankeyi". Tony
  18. Again, the family is Pseudochromidae, and the correct species name is "Ogilbyina novaehollandiae". Tony
  19. This is the wrong family name. It should be Pseudochromidae. Also, as a matter of convention the specific name (aldabraensis) should be with a lower case "a". Tony
×
×
  • Create New...