Jump to content

Is fishless tank beneficial to SPS?


hammy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Been thinking about that for my tank.

My nitrate and phosphate currently is undetectable by dd testkit.

SPS is healthy.

Is fishless beneficial for our close environment SPS? My tank has only 4 fishes... 2 small clown 1 YT and 1flame. Thinking of catching them out. :) I already caught the flame using gemsurf beta box /fish trap :) I think catching the clown is easy.

I will be overseas for 3 weeks during dec... So thinking how I can minimize maintenance during that period. Cannot imagine if the YT die in my tank and no one in the family take out the fish.

2x1.5x1.5 tank

Lighting: AI hydra 52HD

Skimmer: Deltec SC 1455

Reactor: Minimax; rowaphos

Skimz  ; NP biopellets

Wave Maker: MP 40 WQD

Return pump: Eheim 1262

Chiller: Arctica 1/10 hp

 

A righteous man cares for the needs of his animal, but the kindest acts of the wicked are cruel -- Proverbs 12:10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With fishes should be better. The fish poo is what the SPS need to for growth and food.

Although too much nutrient in the tank is not desirable. You must have ways to export

the unnecessary P and N. My 2 ct tthought

6.5 * 2 * 2 + 3.75 * 1.5 *1.5,(Decomn on 14/9/08)
4*2*2 + 2.5*1.25*1.25 (Decomn on 1/8/09)
5*2*2 (Fully LED light system, 140 3 watt SSC leds with 60 degree lens)(Decomm)
2.5*2*2(Fully LED Light System,96 3 watt SSC leds with 60 degree lens)(Decomm)

5*2.5*2(LED only)

Eheim return 1 * pump

1 HP Daikin compressor with cooling coil
2 Jebao OW40, 1 ecotech MP40,
1X6085 Tunze wm,

1 CURVE 7 Skimmer

  1 DIY 80 led control by Bluefish mini 

1 radion XR30W G2, 2 Radion XR15G3

Sump area lite by 5 ft T5 , 6 * SSC 3 watt red LED for refugium

1 Full spectrum E27 led light

1 CR control by bubble count

Start No Water Change since 1st Dec 2016

Add new 2.5x2x 1.5 ft 

 nLekOfpYts.jpg
[/quote]


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fish poo indirectly form the amino acid / food for the corals, and in fact low level of phosphate is beneficial to SPS as well . So as what sherman mention i would vote for less fish then no fish .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a good idea. The fishes waste is extremely beneficial to the benthic organisms residing at the bottom of the tank. This benthic organisms will serve as food to the planktonic chain, and in turn feeds the SPS. It is even more crucial if you are having a ULNS environment. The current fish load of yours should do more good than harm if your SPS' are currently healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...