The story NASA tried to hide abt the moon landing

[Achilles Tang]

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Footage Out-take

If you're at this page because you've just seen an amazing piece of footage showing the Apollo 11 moonlanding to have been shot in a studio, then read on. If you haven't seen the clip, click the link below, and prepare to be amazed.

At 4:17 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on July 20, 1969 Neil Armstrong was seen on television by millions of people around the world apparently walking on the surface of the moon, and making one giant leap into the pages of history. BUT DID HE? Conspiracy theories abound on the Internet.

The piece of footage you just saw answers the question - but raises a lot of others. We don't know the answers to all these questions - but here is what we do know:

1) Is it real?

Yes. This footage was clearly shot in a studio, and is clearly meant to represent the Apollo 11 moon landing. The attention to detail is staggering. The intention is clearly to fool viewers into believing that it is genuine.

2) Is it conclusive?

No. There is no proof that because this was shot in a studio, the moon landing was necessarily faked. But we do know that the original non-digital footage was destroyed and that certain (dangerous) people are very angry that this clip has leaked.

3) How did we get it?

We did not get it directly from a NASA source. Our source is well placed to vouch for the authenticity of the footage and had links with the makers of 2 recent documentaries, one for the BBC and one for CNN about the moonlanding conspiracies. We cannot possibly reveal his identity, and probably never will be able to. His position is more dangerous than you might imagine.

4) Why haven't I seen it before?

The footage has been buried for over 30 years. All the original stock, except this cut, was destroyed. We have had it for over 2 years and in that time have (anonymously) approached almost every large TV network owner to sell the rights. Without exception they were interested and offered to buy it. At one point they were also Then, also without exception they changed their minds and started to try to find out who we were. At that point we stopped dealing with them. It was scary as hell.

5) How, when and where was it made?

It was made in 1965, judging by the camera it was shot on - an Ikegami Tube Camera. We have evidence that the footage was shot outside the US - possibly in Europe, by a foreign crew.

6) Who is inside the suit?

Not one of the original astronauts. In fact, they are totally unaware that this footage was ever shot. The guy in the suit is an actor called Symond Lewis.

7) Why is it on the Internet and not on TV?

See point 4

8) What is NASA's reaction to this footage?

They have refused to comment. But we have recently heard that they are stepping up efforts on a huge PR campaign to convince us all that the Apollo moonlandings all took place.

http://www.moontruth.com/clips/moontruth.mpg

[Sinn]

i saw something like this on the show believe it or not or something like that....

the thing is they dont have very strong points regarding the moon landing...

according to the russians, its imposible to land on the moon due to its temperature , thats their so claimed reason for not landing there...

on defence, the americans said that they had special suits...

the only way to know if the americans did fake the landing is to check the moon for the footprints...

and according to the show, the spaceship is on its way to take closer photographs of the moon...

well till then would we know...

[kelstorm]

stupid rat race to the moon.. dun know whether did they managed to find chang er there with her rabbit and enjoy the mooncake with her.. they should have done a footage of that..

[optimus prime]

hahaha, i saw similar footage long time ago even b4 the internets era.

imagine this- if the fellow is the first man on moon. then who took his pictures when he steps on the moon. the alien?hehehehhe!

that time the US is on pressure to land on the moon as the soviets already

published their intension to do so.

[Tanzy]

I think it's suppose to be a camera mounted on the lunar lander.

[spade]

moreover, for a country that cannot keep secret between the intern and president. cover-up on this magnitude will juz be on the newspaper on the very next day BTW, this controversy on moon landing was shown on Discovery channel sometime back. interesting to c the people arguing on the various "reasonable doubts"